BLOXHAM, THOMAS JOSEPH
1. “Can a court determine that the State’s use of immunized testimony violated Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), without knowing the substance of that immunized testimony?”2. “What is...
The Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney is the voice of the people of Texas before the Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest state court for appeals resulting from criminal cases.
1. “Can a court determine that the State’s use of immunized testimony violated Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), without knowing the substance of that immunized testimony?”2. “What is...
(1) “Whether the lower court misapplied Romero v. State, 173 S.W.3d 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), in finding that the trial court’s masking policy violated the Confrontation Clause.” (2) “Whether th...
“Did the court of appeals error in holding that must apply a mechanical, strict requirement that inventory searches ‘must not deviate’ in any detail from department policy?”
Disclaimer: The legal authorities cited in these papers was current as of the date of their distribution or publication. Because the law is in a continuous state of change, attorneys should exercise due diligence by checking the currentness and completeness of governing legal authorities (i.e., Shepardizing and Keyciting) and applicable statewide and local rules of appellate procedure.
Let the legal incantations begin, as we weave through the tapestries of jurisprudence and unveil the mysteries that lurk in the darkest recesses of criminal discovery. Together, we shall bring fort...
Criminal Case Highlights from the US S. Ct and Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) Sept. 2023 to Aug. 2024
2023 PDR Basics Dawson Criminal Appeals Conference PowerPoint