Bittick, Charles
“Did the Appeals court incorrectly interpret Martin v. State when it determined that the requirement of “continuous association” in a street gang is satisfied by the underlying crime and no additio...
The Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney is the voice of the people of Texas before the Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest state court for appeals resulting from criminal cases.
“Did the Appeals court incorrectly interpret Martin v. State when it determined that the requirement of “continuous association” in a street gang is satisfied by the underlying crime and no additio...
“When two officers both testify about one joint pursuit of an individual after that individual evaded them in a motor vehicle, is there no double jeopardy violation when the individual is charged a...
ON THE COURT’S OWN MOTION 1. “Whether the Ranger made a positive promise to Appellant under Garcia v. State, 919 S.W.2d 370 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994), when he said that ‘there’s no reason on this deal...
Disclaimer: The legal authorities cited in these papers was current as of the date of their distribution or publication. Because the law is in a continuous state of change, attorneys should exercise due diligence by checking the currentness and completeness of governing legal authorities (i.e., Shepardizing and Keyciting) and applicable statewide and local rules of appellate procedure.
Let the legal incantations begin, as we weave through the tapestries of jurisprudence and unveil the mysteries that lurk in the darkest recesses of criminal discovery. Together, we shall bring fort...
Criminal Case Highlights from the US S. Ct and Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) Sept. 2023 to Aug. 2024
2023 PDR Basics Dawson Criminal Appeals Conference PowerPoint